HIRLAM documentation


Order by : Name | Date | Hits | [ Ascendant ]

HIRLAM Scientific Documentation, December 2002 HIRLAM Scientific Documentation, December 2002

Date added: 04/14/2009
Date modified: 04/14/2009
Filesize: 5.73 MB
Downloads: 36566
HIRLAM Scientific Documentation, Per Unden, December 2002

HIRLAM Technical Report No. 58 HIRLAM Technical Report No. 58

Date added: 04/07/2009
Date modified: 04/07/2009
Filesize: 1.02 MB
Downloads: 25610
Analysis of surface variables and parameterization of surface processes in HIRLAM. Part I: Approach and verification by parallel runs, E. Rodriguez, B. Navascues, J.J. Ayuso and S. Jarvenoja
(Manuscript received 23 September 2002, in nal form 17 January 2003.)

Stefan Gollvik and Patrick Samuelsson: A tiled land-surface scheme for HIRLAM Stefan Gollvik and Patrick Samuelsson: A tiled land-surface scheme for HIRLAM

Date added: 05/24/2011
Date modified: 05/24/2011
Filesize: 1.43 MB
Downloads: 19947


This report describes the surface scheme, developed for HIRLAM, and called ”newsnow” during
the development time. It is physically based on the land surface scheme used at the Rossby Centre
(Samuelsson et al., 2006), with some exceptions. The code structure and data assimilation has its
origin in the earlier HIRLAM surface scheme (Rodriguez et al., 2003).
It is a tiled scheme with 7 tiles: Sea, ice, bare soil, low vegetation, forest, snowcovered bare soil and
low vegetation, and finally forest with snow on the forest floor. The basic difference from the earlier
scheme is the introduction of the snow scheme, and a completely new forest formulation. The other
tiles are in principle the same as the old scheme, but we have replaced the force-restore formulation
within the soil, with more layers and heat conduction.
Thus we have two different snow packs, with separate energy balances. For each tile we compute the
latent and sensible heat fluxes and momentum fluxes, and they are weighted together, according to
their grid fractions, to provide a lower boundary condition for the vertical diffusion. The forest has a
separate canopy temperature, common for the tiles with and without snow on the forest floor, so they
are treated together within the scheme. At present no snow on sea ice is incorporated, but we have
one temperature for the uppermost ice layer and the snow.
The water storages treated in the model are, except for soil moisture, intercepted water on low vegetation
and on the forest, snow water equivalent on the ground and forest floor. The snow packs also
treat liquid water within the snow, which can refreeze. We also treat intercepted snow on the forest
canopy, in a simplified way, without a separate temperature.
The main differences from the climate model of the Rossby Centre, is that we have three thermal
layers in the soil and a relaxation to a deep climatological temperature instead of a no flux lower
boundary condition , and that we have kept the force-restore formulation of soil moisture from the
earlier HIRLAM scheme.
We have also a simpler estimation of the snow fraction. The deviations from the climate version, has
mainly to do with the adaptation to the surface data assimilation.

HIRLAM Newsletter No. 43, Paper 10, Cansado and Navascués, 2003 HIRLAM Newsletter No. 43, Paper 10, Cansado and Navascués, 2003

Date added: 03/31/2009
Date modified: 04/21/2009
Filesize: 342.93 kB
Downloads: 18984
Optimum Interpolation Analysis Method for Snow Depth
A.Cansado, B.Navascués, HIRLAM Newsletter No. 43, pp. 58-64, 2003

Sukoriansky et al, 2006 Sukoriansky et al, 2006

Date added: 04/15/2009
Date modified: 04/15/2009
Filesize: Unknown
Downloads: 16581

Sukoriansky et al, 2006: “A quasi-normal scale elimination model of turbulence and its application to stably stratified flows”, Nonlinear Processes In Geophysics 13, 9-22